OnLive’s Director of Corporate Communications Brian Jaquet has shot down rumors that the game streaming service is closing its doors after several media outlets reported the story earlier today. A subset of employees would be brought on to the company created from the remains of OnLive. Perlman also said that the company as it stands now would cease to exist and that no one would be employed by OnLive. this morning where CEO Steve Perlman said that OnLive would be filing for ABC bankruptcy in the state of California-a status that affords them a level of protection from creditors. This morning, an all-hands meeting was called at 10 a.m. The source says that everyone at the company knew things were tight. Update: While OnLive provided the same statement (below) to Kotaku as they did to Joystiq, a new report from Kotaku, citing a source inside OnLive, claimed the company is about to file for bankruptcy and layoff most of its employees:
#Spacechem iphone full#
It’s a company trying to figure out what’s going on.” He further stated that Apple is trying to mislead the jury. Verhoeven then made a comment to portray the good of Samsung: expand full story Then it has Verizon.” Obviously, he was tried to show that customers can make a distinction between devices.Īddressing the emails and documents that show Samsung execs discussing the iPhone, Verhoeven said, “That doesn’t show copying. Samsung continued pinpointing differences in all of its devices, even showing the startup screen of its Galaxy Tab, explaining, “You see Samsung Galaxy Tab for a long time. During all of this, The Verge reported that the jury was completely enthralled. Verhoeven stated that Apple could not prove Samsung copied in its closing statement nor that customers became confused over Apple and Samsung products.įurthermore, Verhoeven discredited key Apple witnesses, including Susan Kare and Apple expert Russell Winer, asserting both witnesses admitted they could not provide any evidence.
If Samsung is found to have “slavishly copied” Apple as proposed, Samsung would not on pay huge damages to Apple, but it could also be barred from the market. Samsung rather believes Apple is trying to win this case to leverage itself in the smartphone and tablet market by blocking Samsung. First off, Samsung’s Charles Verhoeven explained that Apple is trying to go for a bigger target than the $2 billion in damages it think it deserves.
#Spacechem iphone trial#
Samsung trial earlier this afternoon, it was Samsung’s turn to close its case. Sacha Pallenberg tweeted this photo of Lei Jun’s original approach to the launch, making a smaller announcement first and then introducing it with the words …īut hey, two similarly skilled presenters are going to reach the same conclusion about how best to spring a surprise, right?Īfter Apple finished its closing arguments in the Apple vs.
Still, Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun toned it down today, swapping the turtleneck for a t-shirt as he introduced the company’s new wearable, the Mi Band. I can’t quite put my finger on what it is, but there’s something about a company CEO on a stage wearing blue jeans and a black turtleneck that looks somehow familiar … Hmm, anyone ever seen spec boxes like these anywhere before? “It doesn’t matter if somebody else has reached the same conclusion.” “If you have two similarly skilled designers, it makes sense that they would reach the same conclusion,” he argues. And here’s what the Mi Pad looks like – remind you of anything?
Admittedly they don’t look much like iPhones, but they are called … the Mi Phone. Still, I’m sure that’s coincidence.
#Spacechem iphone android#
You’d think it would be pretty hard to deny that Chinese Android phone and tablet manufacturer Xiaomi copies Apple – yet that’s exactly what former Google exec and now Xiaomi’s global vice president Hugo Barra tried to do in an interview with The Verge.Īllegations of it copying Apple are “sweeping sensationalist statements because they have nothing better to talk about,” he says.
0 kommentar(er)
